Oregon Supreme Court· 5/6/1993
State v. Hunter
Citations
- 850 P.2d 366
- 316 Or. 192
- 1993 Ore. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “waiver is an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege” and that whether waiver has occurred depends on the particular circumstances of each case
- waiver is the intentional relin- quishment of a known right, for which there is no particular formula
- waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right, for which there is no particular formula
- waiver “is an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege. Although a waiver must be intentional, there is no particular formula for determining whether a waiver has occurred.”
- a defendant may waive “the statutory rights created under ORS 135.760 to 135.765”
- ‘Waiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 49×
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 20×
- Dept. of Human Services v. W. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-29· cited 19×
- State v. PersonOregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 15×
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 15×
- Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Portland School District No. 1JCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-07· cited 13×
- McMillan v. FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-08· cited 10×
- State v. MottOregon Supreme Court· 2023-04-06· cited 9×
- Gable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-18· cited 5×
- State v. TatarinovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 5×
- Powell v. System Transport Inc.D. Oregon· 2015-01-26· cited 4×
- Danielson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 3×
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 2×
- In re the Marriage of McInnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-20· cited 1×
- State v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 1×
- State v. T. Q. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 1×
- MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF McINNISCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-20
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-19
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.