State v. Cordray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that a stop did not occur until the officers approached defendant and began reciting his rights to him.”
• “Although an attorney’s statements are normally binding on a client, we decline to presume an express, knowing waiver of consent to be tried without a jury from defendant’s failure to object to his attorney’s actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lemon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 13×
• State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 13×
• State v. McDaniel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-05-03· cited 12×
• State v. Charles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 12×
• State v. Huntley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-11· cited 9×
• State v. Mesenbrink
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-13· cited 9×
• State v. Thacker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
• State v. Barber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 6×
• State v. Wenger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 4×
• State v. Becker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-09· cited 3×
• STATE EX REL. DHS v. Sumpter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowers v. Hardwick
  Supreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 953×
• State v. Valdez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
• State v. Naughten
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-02-11· cited 13×
• State v. Norman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-11· cited 11×
• State v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-01-29· cited 9×
• State v. Kimmel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 9×
• State v. Grimes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-04-22· cited 4×
• State v. Madden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-12-23· cited 2×