State v. Hazley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving multiple items of drugs found in various locations throughout the defendant's home
• court refused to review claim that prosecutor committed misconduct in ehciting testimony in violation of Doyle where no contemporaneous objection but found a claimed Doyle violation in closing argument was reviewable as prosecutorial misconduct
• “no meaningful analytical distinction between prosecutorial comment on . . . silence when the defendant has chosen to invoke his or her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and such silence when the defendant’s sole witness has relied on the same privilege”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).