Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/14/2005
State v. Bates
Citations
- 125 P.3d 42
- 203 Or. App. 245
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding “that there is little likelihood that the verdict was affected by any inhibition defendant may have experienced as a 29 result of being required to wear the stun belt” and “that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
- concluding “that there is little likelihood that the verdict was affected by any inhibition defendant may have experienced as a result of being required to wear the stun belt” and “that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brandon Mobley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 142×
- State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 47×
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-20· cited 38×
- State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 18×
- Sproule v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 14×
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-24· cited 9×
- Larsen v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-20· cited 7×
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-14· cited 4×
- Clark v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-12· cited 3×
- State v. McCrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-07· cited 1×
- State v. P. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-10· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Corey JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-02-21
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-01
- YOUNG v. THE STATE 6-24-2021 Substitute Opinion Issued.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-24
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-05
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 206×
- Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-29· cited 196×
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
- People v. MarCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-09-11· cited 128×
- Frederico Gonzalez v. Cheryl Pliler, WardenNinth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 117×
- People v. MartinezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-11· cited 46×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-14· cited 36×
- State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-05-26· cited 30×
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-23· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29· cited 24×
- Hawkins v. Comparet-CassaniC.D. California· 1999-01-25· cited 23×
- State v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.