Skip to main content
· 8/26/2003

Frederico Gonzalez v. Cheryl Pliler, Warden

Citations

  • 341 F.3d 897
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9692
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7744
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17755
  • 2003 WL 22004992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court “must pursue less restrictive alternatives before imposing physical restraints”
  • stating that \the sight of physical restraints may have a significant effect on the jury\
  • stating that “the sight of physical restraints may have a significant effect on the jury”
  • noting that the bailiffs decision to use a stun belt did not undergo close judicial scrutiny
  • noting that the bailiffs decision to use a stun belt did not undergo close judicial scrutiny
  • noting that the bailiff’s decision to use a stun belt did not undergo close judicial scrutiny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Paez, Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.