Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/26/1982
State v. Kessler
Citations
- 645 P.2d 1070
- 57 Or. App. 469
- 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that appearing without restraints affords a defen- dant the opportunity to appear innocent, with “dignity, and self-respect”
- noting that appearing without restraints affords a defen- dant the opportunity to appear innocent, with “dignity, and self-respect”
- reversing and remanding for a new trial when the record was insufficient to determine if the error in shackling the defendant was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
- risk of impinging on presumption of innocence and the dignity of judicial proceedings, as well as inhibiting consultation with counsel and decision whether to testify
- risk of impinging on presumption of innocence and the dignity of judicial proceedings, as well as inhibiting consultation with counsel and decision whether to testify
- trial court erred in failing to articulate the reasons that there was a “substantial necessity” to shackle defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 45×
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-23· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29· cited 24×
- State v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-08· cited 22×
- State v. AminiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 20×
- Davis v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-22· cited 19×
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court· 2015-11-27· cited 19×
- State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-14· cited 18×
- State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 18×
- State v. VoitsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-06· cited 14×
- Sproule v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 14×
- State v. GlickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-04-03· cited 12×
- State v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 11×
- State v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-29· cited 10×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 8×
- State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-13· cited 7×
- State v. FunrueCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-02· cited 6×
- State v. CavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 5×
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-29· cited 4×
- Guinn v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-25· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 373×
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court· 1952-05-21· cited 102×
- State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 55×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-14· cited 36×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1883-10-15· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.