In Re Robert M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the determination of a witness’s competency rests in the discretion of the trial judge, whose decision will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-07-13· cited 137×
• Schmidt v. Courtney
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-12-22· cited 34×
• Callen v. Callen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-19· cited 32×
• State v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-10-16· cited 16×
• Fields Ex Rel. Fields v. Regional Medical Center Orangeburg
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Munn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 43×
• State v. Hudnall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-03· cited 38×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-06· cited 34×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-13· cited 20×
• State v. Pitts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-07-27· cited 18×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-12-02· cited 16×
• Orangeburg County Department of Social Services v. Schlins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-03-30· cited 3×