State v. Avendano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the parties that it was proper to simply reverse the part of the judgment imposing per-diem fee “because the trial court expressly stated at sentencing that it was waiving any fines or fees associated with the convictions” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Debruyne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Avendano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. Chitwood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-10-20· cited 196×
• State v. Barr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 70×
• State v. Parker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-09-05· cited 23×
• State v. Wasyluk
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-02· cited 8×