Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/11/2002
State v. Meyer
Citations
- 53 P.3d 940
- 183 Or. App. 536
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing traffic conviction where Oregon State Police officer lacked statutory authority to stop defendant in Washington for a traffic violation observed in Oregon
- reversing traffic conviction where Oregon State Police officer lacked authority to stop defendant in Washington for traffic violations observed in Oregon
- where the issue was raised to the trial court, “we decline to hold that the possible failure of defendant’s motion to readily fit into any particular procedural pigeonhole divests him of any opportunity to be heard on that issue”
- in enacting statutes, legislators “are deemed to be aware of existing law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Deits, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 65×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. GarciaMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-08· cited 5×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 2×
- State v. KellerMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15· cited 2×
- State v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-30· cited 1×
- State v. KountzMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-14· cited 232×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1998-07-24· cited 80×
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 66×
- Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court· 1951-06-06· cited 45×
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 42×
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 28×
- Deardorf v. Idaho Nat. Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1918-12-31· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. KoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 11×
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-10-27· cited 7×
- STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. OF WASH. v. CasteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-06-28· cited 6×
- State v. NearingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-12-20· cited 4×
- State v. PepperCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.