Skip to main content

State v. Kurtz

Citations

  • 612 P.2d 749
  • 46 Or. App. 617
  • 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding search of visitor’s daypack not being worn by visitor where object of search could have been concealed within day-pack
  • upholding search of visitor's daypack not being worn by visitor where object of search could have been concealed within daypack
  • upheld search of visitor's day pack found in basement following visitor's lawful arrest
  • “Defendant does not contend that the indictment does not contain all the statutory requirements of the offense. To support his theory, defendant must rely on facts extrinsic to those contained in the indictment. A demurrer cannot be sustained on that basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwab, Joseph, Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.