· 3/16/1976
Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services Department
Citations
- 547 P.2d 65
- 89 N.M. 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that an 2 appellate court is not bound by labels as to whether a determination below is a finding 3 of fact or a conclusion of law
- applying principle of de novo review to a determination of whether an accidental injury “arose out of and in the course of the employment”
- appellate court not bound by labels as to whether determination below is a finding of fact or conclusion of law
- when the historical facts are undisputed, the question whether the accident arose out of and in the course of employment is a question of law
- whether a determination is a finding of fact or conclusion of law is a question of law and therefore freely reviewable
- whether a determination is a finding of fact or conclusion of law is a question of law and therefore freely reviewable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montoya, Oman, McManus, Stephenson, Sosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.