Skip to main content
· 3/16/1976

Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services Department

Citations

  • 547 P.2d 65
  • 89 N.M. 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that an 2 appellate court is not bound by labels as to whether a determination below is a finding 3 of fact or a conclusion of law
  • applying principle of de novo review to a determination of whether an accidental injury “arose out of and in the course of the employment”
  • appellate court not bound by labels as to whether determination below is a finding of fact or conclusion of law
  • when the historical facts are undisputed, the question whether the accident arose out of and in the course of employment is a question of law
  • whether a determination is a finding of fact or conclusion of law is a question of law and therefore freely reviewable
  • whether a determination is a finding of fact or conclusion of law is a question of law and therefore freely reviewable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montoya, Oman, McManus, Stephenson, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.