Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/23/2006
State v. Bailey
Citations
- 626 S.E.2d 898
- 368 S.C. 39
- 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in appeal from magistrates court to circuit court, where preservation issue was never brought to the attention of the circuit court, it was not appropriate for this court to review the issue
- The circuit court, acting as the appellate court, reviews the matters raised in the notice of appeal.
- where issue not ruled on by intermediate appellate court and no petition for rehearing is filed seeking a ruling, the issue is not appropriate for this Court's review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Huff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wright v. CraftCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-11-27· cited 150×
- State v. OxnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-01-24· cited 12×
- Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-11-04· cited 9×
- State v. McCombsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 7×
- Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-07-25· cited 4×
- State v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-06-11· cited 4×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-09· cited 665×
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 533×
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
- Norwell v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 92×
- State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 87×
- State v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-29· cited 56×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-05· cited 30×
- State v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-06-17· cited 24×
- State v. RosemondSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-24· cited 23×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 22×
- State v. LaCosteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 17×
- City of Columbia v. ErvinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-05-11· cited 16×
- City of Landrum v. SarrattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-18· cited 14×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 13×
- Condor, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-11-10· cited 8×
- City of Columbia v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-10-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.