City of Columbia v. Ervin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an issue not raised by exception to an intermediate appellate court cannot be raised in a subsequent appeal
• holding an issue not raised by exception to an intermediate appellate court cannot be raised in a subsequent appeal
• noting that the Court of Appeals should not have addressed an issue on appeal where Ervin failed to raise the issue to the circuit court as intermediate appellate court
• stating an issue not raised to an intermediate appellate court cannot be considered in a subsequent appeal to the court of appeals or supreme court
• holding the Court of Appeals should not have addressed the merits of an issue because the issue was not raised by exception to the intermediate appellate court and therefore could not be raised for the first time in the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals
• an issue not raised in an intermediate appeal cannot be consid ered in a subsequent appeal to the court of appeals or supreme court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).