Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/19/1994
State v. Jenkins
Citations
- 884 P.2d 1356
- 76 Wash. App. 378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- as between defendant and the State, the State has primary duty to see that defendant is tried in timely manner
- as between defendant and the State, the State has primary duty to see that defendant is tried in timely manner
- State has primary duty to see that defendant is tried in timely fashion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker, Pekelis, Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 74×
- State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-11-08· cited 30×
- State v. RaschkaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-09· cited 10×
- State v. WilksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-11· cited 8×
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-30· cited 5×
- State v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-20· cited 4×
- State of Washington v. John Martin MalingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-12-18· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Maybury v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1959-03-13· cited 46×
- State v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-29· cited 41×
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-17· cited 32×
- State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-10· cited 25×
- State v. LemleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-03-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.