Skip to main content

State v. Malone

Citations

  • 864 P.2d 990
  • 72 Wash. App. 429
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant did not object within 10 days of initial trial date set beyond speedy trial period as required by CrR 3.3(f)(1)
  • defendant did not object within 10 days of initial trial date set beyond speedy trial period as required by CrR 3.3(f)(1)
  • counsel for defendant had a duty to investigate those easily ascertainable facts relevant to setting the trial date within the speedy trial period. Not timely asserting the defendant's speedy trial right because of a failure to discover easily ascertainable facts constituted a waiver
  • defendant failed to object when initial trial date was set
  • counsel for defendant had a duty to investigate those easily ascertainable facts relevant to setting the trial date within the speedy trial period. Not timely asserting the defendant’s speedy trial right because of a failure to discover easily ascertainable facts constituted a waiver
  • holding that there is no minimum amount 10 No. 44285 -0 -II requirement for possession, in part because \ it is within the province of the Legislature to decide whether possession of a minute quantity of a controlled substance should be punished under the statute. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pekelis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.