Skip to main content

State v. Osborn

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8228

Syllabus

Guilty plea Crim.R. 11 nature of the offenses knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 judicial factfinding consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings firearm specifications R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g). The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11 in ensuring appellant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made the record demonstrates the court found appellant understood the nature of the charges and the record supports the court's determination. The court considered the principles and purposes of felony sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the sentencing factors under R.C. 2929.12 before sentencing appellant. The court did not engage in impermissible judicial factfinding. The trial court made the statutorily mandated findings prior to imposing consecutive sentences. Pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g), the court's imposition of consecutive sentences on the firearm specifications was proper.

Judges: McCormack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.