State v. Bryars
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2765
Syllabus
The imposition of consecutive sentences was not contrary to law where the court made the requisite findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the findings were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The trial court erred in the imposition of postrelease control where the court failed to advise appellant at the sentencing hearing of the term of supervision, that the supervision was discretionary, and of the consequences of violating postrelease control. Notice of postrelease control provided at the plea hearing and the notice set forth in the sentencing entry did not correct the court's failure to impose postrelease control at the sentencing hearing.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.