Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/10/1979
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 178 Conn. 287
- 422 A.2d 323
- 1979 Conn. LEXIS 841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that ‘‘armed’’ is commonly interpreted as requiring that weapon be in one’s possession and, thus, ‘‘it is not necessary for a weapon to be exhibited, displayed, uti- lized or referred to in order for one to be considered ‘armed’ ’’
- not necessary for weapon to be exhibited, displayed, utilized, or referred to in order for one to be considered \armed\
- “[dictionary defines the term ‘armed’ as ‘furnished with weapons of offense or defense: fortified, equipped’ ”
- ‘‘Actually, ‘armed’ is commonly interpreted as simply requiring that a weapon be in one’s possession. . . . It is apparent that it is not necessary for a weapon to be exhibited, displayed, utilized or referred to in order for one to be considered ‘armed.’ ’’ (Citations omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loiselle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-02-12· cited 230×
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-18· cited 140×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-13· cited 107×
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-05-26· cited 84×
- State v. VassSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-20· cited 82×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-07-20· cited 73×
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-09· cited 73×
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-22· cited 69×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-18· cited 65×
- State v. HameleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-14· cited 58×
- State v. DolphinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-19· cited 56×
- State v. TinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-01· cited 52×
- Mays v. MaysSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-22· cited 45×
- State v. SabalaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-22· cited 38×
- State v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-08· cited 37×
- State v. RandleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-18· cited 36×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 35×
- State v. TomlinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-11-25· cited 32×
- State v. ArenaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-01-25· cited 20×
- State v. BrooksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-22· cited 18×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-05-03· cited 144×
- State v. HardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-06-27· cited 68×
- State v. KinseySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-08-02· cited 67×
- State v. TroynackSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-12-20· cited 57×
- State v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1976-07-09· cited 41×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-10-11· cited 23×
- People v. DozieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-01-31· cited 13×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-11-18· cited 13×
- People v. RostamoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-04-10· cited 8×
- State v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-11-14· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.