State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was no speedy trial violation in part because the defendant did not show “that there was any attempt by the state to unfairly delay the prosecution in order to gain a tactical advantage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-11-05· cited 108×
• State v. Ness
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 107×
• State v. Wermerskirchen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-03-12· cited 77×
• State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 70×
• State v. Quattrocchi
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-07-31· cited 50×
• State v. Pignolet
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-09-01· cited 46×
• State v. Crocker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-07-24· cited 41×
• State v. Bolts
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-02-15· cited 20×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 19×
• State v. Haala
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-10· cited 17×
• Muhammed v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-03-12· cited 7×
• State v. Dupay
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-12· cited 3×
• In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-02-04· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• United States v. Marion
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
• United States v. Lovasco
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 2,170×
• State v. Billstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×