Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 5/12/1987

State v. Dupay

Citations

405 N.W.2d 444
1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

three Spreigl offenses admitted without error to show a common plan or scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Sedgwick, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Yang
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-05-08· cited 9×
State v. Belssner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-12-18
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Allen Reynolds
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Ulvinen
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 133×
State v. Ture
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
State v. Doughman
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 52×
State v. Googins
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-03· cited 27×
State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-03-19· cited 21×
State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-11-03· cited 19×
State v. McCoy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-02-17· cited 15×
State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-24· cited 11×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.