Supreme Court of Iowa· 11/22/1989

State v. Anderson

Citations

448 N.W.2d 32
1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 340
1989 WL 141485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding it significant in examining whether prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced defendant that evidence of his guilt “was ironclad”
observing that prejudice does not usually “result from isolated prosecutorial misconduct”
fleeting conversation between juror and reserve special deputy, who declared, “what’s this not guilty shit,” was not basis for new trial
fleeting conversation between juror and reserve special deputy, who declared, “what’s this not guilty shit,” was not basis for new trial
fleeting conversation between juror and reserve special deputy, who declared, “what’s this not guilty shit,” was not basis for new trial
fleeting conversation between juror and reserve special deputy, who declared, “what’s this not guilty shit,” was not basis for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Larson, Carter, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.