Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 695 So. 2d 309
  • 1997 WL 280058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that dual convictions under different provisions punishing “the same basic crime (i.e., the violation of a legal obligation to tell the truth)” were invalid
  • “Legislative intent is the polestar that guides our analysis in double jeopardy issues.... ”
  • “Legislative intent [clearly reflected in the Florida Statutes] is the polestar that guides our analysis in double jeopardy issues. . . .”
  • both crimes arose from the same sexual battery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.