Skip to main content

Gibbs v. State

Citations

  • 698 So. 2d 1206
  • 1997 WL 476416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dual convictions were impermissible where both crimes arose from possession of the same cocaine
  • holding double jeopardy analysis of trafficking and possession both based on possession should have compared only trafficking possession and simple possession
  • finding that double jeopardy prohibited dual convictions for trafficking by possession of a large quantity of drugs in trunk of car and simple possession of a smaller quantity on person
  • holding a person may not be convicted and punished for both trafficking possession of cocaine [based on possession of a specified amount of the drug] and simple possession of a controlled substance
  • not finding “quantity” element of trafficking possession to constitute an element that simple possession does' not have, where simple possession punishes any quantity of drugs possessed
  • “[T]he legislature intended that trafficking possession, which requires the possession of more than twenty-eight grams of cocaine, be punished more harshly than simple possession, which merely requires the possession of less than twenty-eight grams of any illegal drug.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.