Skip to main content
· 1/10/1978

State v. Calanche

Citations

  • 574 P.2d 1018
  • 91 N.M. 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that factual 5 recitations in the docketing statement are accepted as true unless the record on appeal 6 shows otherwise.
  • stating that 19 factual recitations in the docketing statement are accepted as true unless the record on 2 1 appeal shows otherwise
  • stating that factual recitations in the docketing 5 1 statement are accepted as true unless the record on appeal shows otherwise
  • stating that factual recitations 9 in the calendaring documents filed in this Court are accepted as true unless the record 10 on appeal shows otherwise
  • stating that factual recitations 19 in the docketing statement are accepted as true unless the record on appeal shows 3 1 otherwise
  • facts in the docketing statement are accepted as 3 true unless contradicted by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Hernandez, Lopez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.