State v. Ames
Citations
- 47 Wash. 328
- 92 P. 137
- 1907 Wash. LEXIS 761
Syllabus
<p>Pilots—Regulation—Power of State. The legislature has power to regulate pilotage of the public waters within the boundaries of the state so far as relates to vessels engaged in strictly, foreign commerce, since Congress has not attempted to regulate the same.</p> <p>Statutes—Validitx of Portion. The invalidity of a provision for a penalty for acts made misdemeanors does not affect the balance of the act, as the misdemeanors are punishable under the general statute, Bal. Code, § § 6776, 7435.</p> <p>Statutes—Title—Subjects Included—Pilotage. An act entitled “to establish pilot regulations” in certain waters, is broad enough to include provisions relating to a penalty for violation of the statute.</p> <p>Constitutional Law—Class Legislation—Pilots. An act requiring an applicant for a pilot’s license to be a qualified voter does not unlawfully discriminate between citizens of the state.</p> <p>Pilots—Statutes—Construction. The pilotage law, Bal. Code, §§ 3216-3243, applies to vessels propelled by steam as well as sailing vessels.</p> <p>Same. The pilotage law, Bal. Code, §§ 3216-3243, as amended by Laws 1901, p. 17, is not objectionable as indefinite or as prescribing different penalties for the same offense.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- piloting without license prosecution still valid despite repeal of crime during appeal
- piloting without license prosecution still valid despite repeal of crime during appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Herriott v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1972-07-27· cited 26×
- State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court· 1910-05-21· cited 21×
- State v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court· 1924-05-07· cited 13×
- State v. HanoverWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-29· cited 12×
- State of Washington v. Justin Robert RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-17· cited 10×
- State v. MerchantWashington Supreme Court· 1907-12-11· cited 10×
- Hambach v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1912-07-18· cited 9×
- Asakura v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1922-10-24· cited 8×
- McCoy v. McCauleyE.D. Washington· 1937-07-08· cited 4×
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court· 1910-02-03· cited 3×
- State v. DeerWashington Supreme Court· 1914-06-20· cited 1×
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of SnellingWashington Supreme Court· 1924-03-24
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Plumb v. ChristieSupreme Court of Georgia· 1898-03-24· cited 97×
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court· 1892-04-26· cited 69×
- State v. BurgdoerferSupreme Court of Missouri· 1891-10-15· cited 41×
- Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 31×
- People v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court· 1894-02-12· cited 20×
- In re PrattSupreme Court of Colorado· 1893-09-15· cited 18×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1884-03-04· cited 16×
- State ex rel. Henry v. MacdonaldWashington Supreme Court· 1901-05-02· cited 7×
- State v. KarstendiekSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1897-12-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.