Oregon Supreme Court· 4/26/1892
State v. Shaw
Citations
- 22 Or. 287
- 29 P. 1028
- 1892 Ore. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- single subject rule is not intended to prevent legislation containing “such means as are reasonably adapted to secure the object” of the law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court· 1960-06-02· cited 94×
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court· 1996-01-19· cited 79×
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court· 1914-10-20· cited 65×
- Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1953-04-29· cited 59×
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court· 1986-10-21· cited 51×
- Kalich v. KnappOregon Supreme Court· 1914-06-02· cited 43×
- Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-12-22· cited 42×
- Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1918-10-01· cited 38×
- Ellis v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court· 1901-01-28· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court· 1926-07-30· cited 34×
- Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1916-12-05· cited 32×
- State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-28· cited 31×
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-11-13· cited 30×
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1950-02-15· cited 29×
- State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court· 1907-08-20· cited 28×
- State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court· 1912-12-17· cited 26×
- Ex parte HoweOregon Supreme Court· 1894-08-02· cited 23×
- State v. PutneyOregon Supreme Court· 1924-03-25· cited 23×
- Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1957-01-09· cited 22×
- State v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court· 1899-11-20· cited 20×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 485×
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court· 1865-10-28· cited 427×
- Burnside v. Lincoln County CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1887-12-10· cited 38×
- Cole v. HallIllinois Supreme Court· 1882-05-12· cited 24×
- State v. LightOregon Supreme Court· 1889-02-25· cited 22×
- State v. SamOregon Supreme Court· 1887-01-05· cited 18×
- Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1881-12-15· cited 15×
- O'Keefe v. WeberOregon Supreme Court· 1886-04-26· cited 13×
- State v. PackardOregon Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 12×
- Hall v. BunteIndiana Supreme Court· 1863-05-15· cited 11×
- Gillitt v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-12-05· cited 9×
- Howland Coal & Iron Works v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1878-04-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.