Holton v. State
Citations
- 28 Fla. 303
Syllabus
<p>Intercourse with Females within Prohibited Age. — Indictment — Constitutionality of law — Evidence.</p> <p>1. Chapter 8760, Laws of 1887, entitled “ An act to protect females of immature age and judgment from licentiousness,” held not to he obnoxious to that provision of section 16 of Article III, Constitution of 1885, that provides: “Each law enacted in the Legislature shall embrace but one subject and matter properly connected therewith, which subject shall be briefly expressed in the title.”</p> <p>2. A liberal rule of construction should be applied when the constitutionality of legislative enactments are questioned; and every reasonable doubt should be resolved in favor of the constitutionality of the act assailed.</p> <p>8. An indictment under the provisions of Chapter 8760, Laws of 1887, is sufficient if it charges the offense in the language of the statute, every necessary ingredient, of the crime being included in the words of the statute.</p> <p>4. It is unnecessary, in such an indictment, to allege that the act charged was with or without consent, or with or without force; ■ or that it was knowingly or wilfully committed.</p> <p>5. In such cases testimony as to the prior habits or character of the female is inadmissible, as it is immaterial.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant \will not be allowed to excuse himself by asserting ignorance as to her age\ in affirming conviction for carnal intercourse with an unmarried female under the age of seventeen
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Chavez-HernandezFifth Circuit· 2012-02-14· cited 132×
- Chesebrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-12-08· cited 100×
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-30· cited 58×
- Hayes v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 57×
- Ex parte KnightSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 56×
- Burrell v. Mississippi State Tax Com'nMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-08-10· cited 52×
- Fleming, Mark AlexanderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-18· cited 50×
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-09-19· cited 47×
- State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-02-10· cited 44×
- Campbell v. Skinner Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 26×
- Buchanan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-04-21· cited 25×
- County of Hillsborough v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-15· cited 24×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 23×
- State v. AmesWashington Supreme Court· 1907-10-19· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. HilburnSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-07-09· cited 14×
- Feliciano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-20· cited 9×
- Gorey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-02-15· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Gonzalez v. PalmesSupreme Court of Florida· 1887-06-15· cited 42×
- Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1881-12-15· cited 15×
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-01-15· cited 11×
- State ex rel. McCarty v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court· 1866-05-15· cited 10×
- Municipality No. Three v. MichoudSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1851-06-15· cited 9×
- Gillitt v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-12-05· cited 9×
- Snowden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1879-06-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.