Skip to main content

State v. Oakley

Citations

  • 129 Wash. 553
  • 225 P. 425

Syllabus

<p>Statutes (18) — Subject and Title — Warehousemen—Regulation of Business. The warehousemen’s act, entitled an act (1) for the prevention of fraud in the grain and hay trade, (2) for the establishment of standards, (3) regulating warehousemen and dealers, (4) defining the duties of railroads, (5) regulating tracks and connections, and (6) providing penalties, does not embrace distinct and unrelated subjects, in violation of Const. Art. II, § 19, providing that no bill shall embrace more than one subject and that subject expressed in the title; nor was it necessary to mention in the title that a bond is required of warehousemen.</p> <p>Warehousemen (5) — Liability—Conversion—Necessity for Demand. A demand upon a warehouseman to restore or deliver wheat, as contemplated by Rem. Comp. Stat., § 7001, in order to authorize an action upon his bond, is not a condition precedent to such an action where the warehouseman was insolvent and had converted the wheat and placed it out of his power to comply with the demand.</p> <p>Warehousemen (5) — Principal and Surety (47) — Action on Bond — Liability—Conditions Precedent. Since the conversion of wheat by a warehouseman renders him liable therefor without any demand, a demand is not a condition precedent to an action against the sureties upon his bond the obligation of which was to answer that the warehouseman shall faithfully perform the acts and duties enjoined upon him by law.</p> <p>Pasties (24) — Joinder—Principal and Surety — Joint and Several Bond. In the case of a joint and several bond upon which the principal is liable, the sureties may be sued separately from the principal, under Rem. Comp. Stat., § 192, giving the plaintiff the right to sue all or any of the persons severally liable on the same obligation.</p> <p>Warehousemen (5)— Conversion of Goods — Evidence — Sufficiency. A wrongful conversion of wheat by a warehouseman is sufficiently shown by proof that he consigned it to a creditor on demand that his account

Judges: Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.