Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/10/2018
State v. Allen
Citations
- 432 P.3d 250
- 294 Or. App. 301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “transience of defendant’s youth and any concomitant sus- ceptibility to reformation”
- “transience of defendant’s youth and any concomitant sus- ceptibility to reformation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Hadlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-17· cited 17×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-28· cited 14×
- State v. Lara-VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 12×
- State v. FudgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-30· cited 6×
- State v. RideoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-15· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
- State v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 59×
- State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 56×
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court· 2010-09-10· cited 26×
- Kinkel v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court· 2018-05-10· cited 24×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.