State v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as admissible “the attempt to procure a witness with the express purpose of testifying falsely is relevant” per state rule of evidence substantially identical to Rule 401

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ferguson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 27×
• State v. Ikirt
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-03-30· cited 17×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-04-09· cited 8×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-01-15· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 56×
• State v. Hensley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-30· cited 41×
• State v. Settle
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-01-17· cited 38×
• State v. Bravo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-11-10· cited 22×
• State v. Adair
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 20×