Skip to main content
· 1/6/1967

State v. Scalzo

Citations

  • 275 Minn. 562
  • 147 N.W.2d 926
  • 1967 Minn. LEXIS 1077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The more enlightened majority rule appears to be that a parent does not have the privilege of inflicting brutal treatment upon each of his children in succession before they may individually obtain the protection of the state.”
  • “The more enlightened majority rule appears to be that a parent does not have the privilege of inflicting brutal treatment upon each of his children in succession before they may individually obtain the protection of the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Been, Consideration, Peterson, Submission, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.