Skip to main content
· 6/14/1984

Morris v. Woodside

Citations

  • 682 P.2d 905
  • 101 Wash. 2d 812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating the trial court’s factual findings as verities on appeal because party failed to provide verbatim report of proceedings that was relevant to the disputed findings of fact
  • because State failed to provide verbatim report of proceedings which constituted evidence relevant to the disputed findings of fact, Court of Appeals would consider factual findings to be verities on appeal
  • because State failed to provide verbatim report of proceedings which constituted evidence relevant to the disputed findings of fact, Court of Appeals would consider factual findings to be verities on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.