Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/28/2023

State v. Bradley

Citations

542 P.3d 56
329 Or. App. 736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

asking a defendant during a traffic stop whether he had “anything on [him] that [he was] not supposed to have” was not reasonably necessary to effectuate the stop for driving under the influence of intoxicants
asking a defendant during a traffic stop whether he had “anything on [him] that [he was] not supposed to have” was not reasonably necessary to effectuate the stop for driving under the influence of intoxicants
“[A]lthough no party on appeal addresses the issue, we must address the question of harmlessness because we have an independent obligation under the state constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.