State Ex Rel. Bardacke v. Welsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge need not recuse 18 when the movant cannot demonstrate that the judge is personally embroiled in the case 19 and when the movant raises no legitimate reasons for disqualification
• explaining that “less restrictive method of regulating access is not required when the facts show a pattern of conduct which is either vexatious, oppressive or for the purpose of harassment”
• declining to apply the rule of necessity when a judge from another court could be designated to hear a case
• affirming the admission, 11 under Rules 11-1005 and 11-902(4) (current version at Rule 11-902(D)), of court 12 records that had been certified by the Bernalillo County District Court Clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).