State v. Swafford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court was within its 18 discretion when it suppressed evidence of the victim’s sexual activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Swafford v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-05-01· cited 537×
• State v. Bachicha
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-31· cited 47×
• State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-01-29· cited 23×
• People v. Reese
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 10×
• Ronald T. Swafford v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-04-19

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Keeble v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 1,048×
• State v. Franklin
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-30· cited 454×
• State v. Fish
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-04-09· cited 118×
• State v. Boeglin
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-01-21· cited 83×
• State v. McCrary
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 66×
• State v. Herrera
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-25· cited 62×
• State v. Benavidez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 43×
• State v. Williams
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 42×
• State v. Reynolds
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-08-19· cited 35×
• State v. Kenneman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-23· cited 34×
• State Ex Rel. Bardacke v. Welsh
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 30×
• State v. Romero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-01-17· cited 30×
• State v. Roybal
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-04-28· cited 27×
• State v. Schifani
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-08-08· cited 26×
• State v. Reese
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-09-27· cited 26×
• State v. Ford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18· cited 8×
• State v. Holtry
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-12-10· cited 6×