United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a factual determination that a party intentionally waived its right to arbitrate should be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence
• stating that a party “who claims the right to arbitration must take some action to enforce that right . . . within a reasonable time after the suit is filed” (citations omitted)
• stating that a party “who claims the right to arbitration must take some action to enforce that right . . . within a reasonable time after the suit is filed” (citations omitted)
• stating that “[p]reparation for trial by a party based on the belief that the other party does not desire or intend to make a demand for arbitration has been held to constitute substantial prejudice”
• stating that the type of hearing necessary for purposes of 13 due process depends on the nature of the case and that motions are generally decided 14 on the papers, without live testimony
• finding 23 Arizona Legislature enacted a Uniform State Antitrust Act in A.R.S. section 44–1401 24 (1974) with underlying purpose to establish a “public policy of first magnitude” in 25 furthering a competitive economy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).