Skip to main content

Starks v. State

Citations

  • 127 S.W.3d 127
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8925
  • 2003 WL 22382570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when, as here, appellant did not submit jury charge containing requested instructions, he was required to make specific objection to the trial court’s charge to preserve his points of error for appellate review
  • stating that, because 4 defendant failed to submit jury charge containing instruction on self-defense, he had to preserve error by making specific objection to trial court’s charge
  • “To determine if there is any harm, the degree of harm must be weighed in light of the entire jury charge, state of the evidence, counsels’ arguments, and any other relevant information revealed by the trial record as a whole.”
  • discussing three 12 types of rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Radack, Nuchia, Hanks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.