E.D. Kentucky· 5/31/2013

Stanford v. United States

Citations

948 F. Supp. 2d 729
2013 WL 2422790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

granting judgment on the pleadings on a common- law-indemnity crossclaim because the crossclaimant failed to make factual allegations necessary to render the crossclaim plausible under Twombly, and noting that a Rule 12(c
“Since the statute requires the factfinder to assign a ‘percentage of fault’ to all the parties to a claim, codefendants do not need to raise crossclaims for apportionment.”
“Contribution applies only where the parties share ‘equal fault’ for the plaintiff’s injury.”
if either prong is absent, then the entity enjoys no immunity
assessing the balance of an area planning commission’s activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thapar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stanford v. United States

24 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.