Skip to main content
· 4/18/2001

George M. Weeks, III v. Robert Bayer, Individually and in His Capacity as Director, Nevada Department of Prisons

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 1231
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3071
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3773
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6757
  • 2001 WL 388695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[discussions about the funding and finances of public programs are sometimes matters of public concern”
  • concluding that to permit plaintiff “to 7 amend his complaint post-judgment ... would simply grant him the forbidden second bite at the 8 apple” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that a party must overcome a “high hurdle” to obtain relief under Rule 59(e) since only “highly unusual circumstances” will justify its application
  • explaining that a party must overcome a “high hurdle” to obtain relief under Rule 59(e) since only “highly unusual circumstances” will justify its application
  • noting that a party must 14 overcome a “high hurdle” to obtain relief under Rule 59(e)
  • explaining that a party must overcome a “high hurdle” to obtain relief under Rule 59(e) since only “highly unusual circumstances” will justify its application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, McKeown, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.