Skip to main content
· 11/25/1987

Crime Fighters Patrol v. Hiles

Citations

  • 740 S.W.2d 936
  • 1987 Ky. LEXIS 271
  • 1987 WL 1799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning that the particular factual circumstances of the case will often determine whether the parties are in pari delicto
  • noting that both contractual and common law indemnity arise in this case, but that appellants did not contest the contractual indemnity in this case
  • noting that both contractual and common law indemnity arise in this case, but that appellants did not contest the contractual indemnity in this case
  • “The spouse’s right to loss of consortium is a separate claim, not dependent on her husband’s ability to recover in those situations where the claim of the injured spouse is barred for some reason other than liability.” (citation omitted)
  • “The spouse’s right to loss of consortium is a separate claim, not dependent on her husband’s ability to recover in those situations where the claim of the injured spouse is barred for some reason other than liability.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leibson, Stephens, Gant, Lambert, Wintersheimer, Stephenson, Vance, Hiles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.