· 11/25/1987
Crime Fighters Patrol v. Hiles
Citations
- 740 S.W.2d 936
- 1987 Ky. LEXIS 271
- 1987 WL 1799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warning that the particular factual circumstances of the case will often determine whether the parties are in pari delicto
- noting that both contractual and common law indemnity arise in this case, but that appellants did not contest the contractual indemnity in this case
- noting that both contractual and common law indemnity arise in this case, but that appellants did not contest the contractual indemnity in this case
- “The spouse’s right to loss of consortium is a separate claim, not dependent on her husband’s ability to recover in those situations where the claim of the injured spouse is barred for some reason other than liability.” (citation omitted)
- “The spouse’s right to loss of consortium is a separate claim, not dependent on her husband’s ability to recover in those situations where the claim of the injured spouse is barred for some reason other than liability.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leibson, Stephens, Gant, Lambert, Wintersheimer, Stephenson, Vance, Hiles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.