Les Kepley v. Gerald Lanz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal court applying state law “must follow the decisions of the state’s highest court when that court has addressed the relevant issue”
• explaining that a federal court “may rely on the state’s intermediate appellate court decisions” in anticipating how the state’s highest court would rule
• “In diversity cases, a federal court must rely upon the substantive law of the forum state.”
• “In diversity cases, a federal court must rely upon the substantive law of the forum No. 18-4267 Perry v. Allstate Indemnity Co., et al. Page 13 state.”
• “Standing ‘goes to [a c]ourt’s subject matter jurisdiction[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).