Skip to main content

Stachowski v. State

Citations

  • 6 A.3d 907
  • 416 Md. 276
  • 2010 Md. LEXIS 622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Court of Appeals of Maryland does not have jurisdiction to issue a certiorari writ in a case where the Court of Special Appeals summarily denied an application for leave to appeal
  • explaining, in the context of a guilty plea and probation violation, that when the Court of Special Appeals summarily denies leave to appeal, § 12-202 divests the Court of Appeals of Maryland of certiorari jurisdiction to review the case any further
  • “The General Assembly is presumed to be aware of this Court’s interpretation of its enactments and, if such interpretation is not legislatively overturned, to have acquiesced in that interpretation.”
  • ‘We construe the [language of a statute] so as to give effect to each word so that no word, clause, sentence or phrase is rendered superfluous or nugatory.” (Alteration in original) (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, Eldridge, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stachowski v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.