Skip to main content
· 6/18/2015

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Lafarge North America, Inc.

Citations

  • 443 Md. 265
  • 116 A.3d 493
  • 2015 Md. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Article 8 of the Declaration of Rights – Maryland’s separation of powers requirement – “prevents the courts from making de novo administrative decisions in cases in which some exercise of agency expertise or discretion may yet remain to be applied”
  • conducting statutory interpretation analysis in determining whether to remand to the agency for a complete “do-over” or to remand to the agency for a narrower determination
  • refund claims brought under § 25-106 of the Public Utility Article are contested cases under the APA, because the agency is required to hold a hearing to determine whether the claimant is entitled to a refund and, if so, in what amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.