Court of Appeals of Virginia· 8/28/1990
Srinivasan v. Srinivasan
Citations
- 396 S.E.2d 675
- 10 Va. App. 728
- 7 Va. Law Rep. 221
- 1990 Va. App. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellant has primary responsibility of ensuring that complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that errors assigned may be properly decided
- holding that \an appellant has the primary responsibility of ensuring that a complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that the errors assigned may be decided properly\
- holding that “an appellant has the primary responsibility of ensuring that a complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that the errors assigned may be decided properly”
- holding that appellant has primary responsibility of ensuring that complete record is furnished to an appellate court so that - 4 - errors assigned may be properly decided
- explaining that “[f]ashioning an equitable distribution award lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge”
- explaining that “[f]ashioning an equitable distribution award lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. Swann (ORDER)Supreme Court of Virginia· 2015-08-28· cited 390×
- Brandau v. BrandauCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-09-16· cited 152×
- McDavid v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-12-13· cited 139×
- Joynes v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-08-28· cited 136×
- Barker v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-06-16· cited 135×
- Yasmine S. Hamad v. Sammy N. HamadCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-03-26· cited 134×
- Tynes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-10-17· cited 130×
- Theismann v. TheismannCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-07-31· cited 130×
- Sargent v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-08-22· cited 124×
- Thomas C. Shooltz v. Jane Hoffman ShooltzCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-04-28· cited 121×
- George M. Epps, Sheriff of City of Petersburg, Virginia v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-03-14· cited 115×
- Sara Rahbaran v. Kamran RahbaranCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-12-23· cited 104×
- Kirby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-12-11· cited 102×
- Ranney v. RanneyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-02-01· cited 96×
- Laura McGahey Roberts White v. David Carlton WrightCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-02-19· cited 93×
- Miller v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-01-11· cited 93×
- Furr v. FurrCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-01-07· cited 92×
- Twardy v. TwardyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-09· cited 92×
- Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-09· cited 88×
- Marie Holt Hart v. James P. Hart, IIICourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-03-31· cited 73×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McGuire v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-04-24· cited 195×
- Smoot v. SmootSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-06-12· cited 109×
- Blank v. BlankCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-03-13· cited 108×
- Aster v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 83×
- Zipf v. ZipfCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-07-11· cited 72×
- Rexrode v. RexrodeCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-02-04· cited 62×
- Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-09-02· cited 50×
- Sawyer v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1985-09-17· cited 42×
- Lambert v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-04-05· cited 38×
- Baytop v. BaytopSupreme Court of Virginia· 1957-10-14· cited 15×
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1976-09-02· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.