Tynes v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate court cannot determine prejudicial effect of excluded testimony without proffer of expected testimony
• holding that appellate court cannot determine prejudicial effect of excluded testimony without proffer of expected testimony
• holding that appellate court cannot determine prejudicial effect of excluded testimony without proffer of expected testimony
• holding that defendant failed to make an adequate proffer to support assertion that the trial court erred
• explaining that without a proffer, the appellate court could not determine the admissibility of proposed testimony
• noting that absent a proper proffer, the appellate court could not determine whether the trial court erred by excluding testimony or whether that exclusion was prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).