Skip to main content
· 3/26/2013

Yasmine S. Hamad v. Sammy N. Hamad

Citations

  • 61 Va. App. 593
  • 739 S.E.2d 232
  • 2013 WL 1195602
  • 2013 Va. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing whether evidence proved that separate property commingled with marital property was traceable
  • noting “[e]quitable distribution involves three distinct decisions: classification, valuation, and distribution”
  • noting “[e]quitable distribution involves three distinct decisions: classification, valuation, and distribution”
  • \This bell-shaped curve of reasonability governing our appellate review rests on the venerable belief that the judge closest to the contest is the judge best able to discern where the equities lie.\
  • “Th[e] bell-shaped curve of reasonability [underlying the abuse of discretion standard] rests on the venerable belief that the judge closest to the contest is the judge best able to discern where the equities lie.”
  • “The court correctly acknowledged the general principle that the valuation should correspond to the evidentiary hearing and never suggested otherwise. The trial court did not make a conscious decision to . . . disfavor more current information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank, Humphreys, Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.