McDavid v. McDavid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court may “choose among conflicting assessments of value as long as its finding is supported by the evidence”
• noting that the value of separate property is irrelevant and immaterial to equitable distribution decisions
• explaining that fair market value of assets is appropriate to value a real estate holding company
• applying harmless error analysis to affirm despite the court’s failure to value property that it classified as separate because the lack of evidence of value of separate property had no impact on the equitable distribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).