Spudnuts, Inc. v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a fraud claim cannot “be predicated on unfulfilled promises, expressions of intention of statements concerning future events unless such were made with the present intent not to perform”
• stating 13 that a fraud claim cannot “be predicated on unfulfilled promises, expressions of intention 14 of statements concerning future events unless such were made with the present intent not 15 to perform.”
• “[T]he courts should be liberal in allowing amendments to the pleading when [Rule 9(b)] is violated.”
• purpose of particularity requirement is to avoid surprise at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).