Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/23/1984
Hall v. Romero
Citations
- 685 P.2d 757
- 141 Ariz. 120
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claim accrued by 23 November 1974, even though the breaching party had “promised to perform in the future,” 24 because such future promises “did not eradicate the fact that . . . [the breaching party] had 25 already broken its promise to perform”
- applying shorter limitations period because the court was “not in substantial doubt” about which limitations period applied
- rejecting fraud claim based on statement that “you’ll never find a better, more secure investment”
- finding no abuse of discretion when trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend after summary judgment had been entered against them
- finding no abuse of discretion when trial court denied plaintiffs' motion to amend after summary judgment had been entered against them
- granting summary judgment for moving party because non-moving party’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greer, Meyerson, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501904Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-07-19· cited 302×
- Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. PartnershipNinth Circuit· 2011-01-03· cited 106×
- Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 69×
- Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-22· cited 56×
- MacCollum v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-13· cited 47×
- Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-10-16· cited 45×
- Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-12-20· cited 40×
- Linder v. Brown & HerrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-01-07· cited 39×
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-09-23· cited 38×
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 35×
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-05· cited 32×
- Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-31· cited 31×
- Albers v. Edelson Technology Partners L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-04· cited 31×
- Bogue v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-01-11· cited 28×
- RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-09-02· cited 24×
- Sirek v. Fairfield Snowbowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-30· cited 23×
- Ebrahimi v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-10-19· cited 21×
- Porter v. SpaderCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-21· cited 21×
- Warfield v. AlanizD. Arizona· 2006-09-05· cited 18×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-12-19· cited 15×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court· 1979-06-28· cited 79×
- Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1980-04-30· cited 48×
- Ellis v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-26· cited 37×
- Staheli v. KauffmanArizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-10· cited 26×
- Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-02-18· cited 24×
- Spudnuts, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-02-26· cited 24×
- Joy Enterprises, Inc. v. ReppelArizona Supreme Court· 1975-06-27· cited 16×
- Page Investment Company v. StaleyArizona Supreme Court· 1970-04-29· cited 10×
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile No. J-86509Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.