Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the standard of proving fraudulent inducement with respect to written contracts “is extremely high, and a written contract will be cancelled only in a clear ease of fraud supported by clear and convincing evidence” (citations omitted)
• finding that a lender has no duty to preserve the value of pledged securities by financially supporting the issuing company
• finding that a lender has no duty to preserve the value of pledged securities by financially supporting the issuing company
• vacating die order awarding attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incident to vacating the summary judgment certified for appellate review under HRCP Rule 54(b)
• parol evidence rule not applicable \where it appears that a written agreement has been conceived in fraud\
• the elements of fraudulent inducement are: “(1) a representation of material fact, (2) made for the purpose of inducing the other party to act, (3) known to be false but reasonably believed true by the other party, and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).